|
| 社会史视角下的政治史研究路径 |
| Probe into the Path of Political History in the Perspective of Social History |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1008-5092.2013.01.008 |
| 中文关键词: 社会史 政治史 政治社会史 路径探析 |
| 英文关键词: social history political history political and social history path of exploration |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3771 |
| 全文下载次数: 3155 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中国的历史研究自古以来甚为发达,尤其是政治史的研究,但在清末民初时,由梁启超等人提倡的史学革命,对政治史提出了挑战,但对政治史研究的本质并没有很大改变,它仍然是对中国古代一系列政治事件和政治制度的机械描述,从而让人们无法领悟到中国政治运作的那种诡谲以及其与中国人民日常生活的关联意义.而新中国成立之后的马克思主义史学的建立,政治史在实质上仍然没有摆脱这个宿命.改革开放以后,政治史式微,而社会史则进入了中国历史研究的领域,并俨然成为了一种史学范式,但当下的社会史研究好像为自身规定了一条准则——摆脱政治史.这也是社会史的一个致命缺陷,它忘记了人类自产生以来就撇不清与政治的关系,脱离政治史的社会史,无疑是缺乏高度和深度的.而事实上恰恰相反,社会史不但有能力去研究政治史,而且相信能更好地研究政治史. |
| 英文摘要: |
| China’s historical research has been highly developed since ancient times,Especially the research of the political history.But in the period of the late Qing Dynasty,Liang Qichao and others put forward the Historians Revolution,it is no doubt a challenge for political history.However,the essence of the political history hasn’t changed,it is still a kind of description about a series of the events sequence and mechanical system.We can not feel the strangeness of political operation and the significance associated with people’s daily life from the political history.After the founding of New China,the establishment of Marxist historians wasn’t still break away from the historians dilemma.In the period of reform and opening up,social history has developed into new field of historical research,it has become a historians paradigm,but it seems to set out a criteria by itself-get rid of political history.Nevertheless,its fatal flaw is that it forgot the relationship between political history and social history is closely related ever since human beings appeared.Once the lack of political history,social history will be undoubtedly lack of height and depth.In fact,social history research can not only have the ability to study political history,but also study political history better. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|