|
| 寻衅滋事罪的构成要件与公安执法研究 |
| Research on the Constitutive Elements of the Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble under Article 293 of the Criminal Law and Public Security Law Enforcement |
| 投稿时间：2026-03-20 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.202604006 |
| 中文关键词: 寻衅滋事罪 公安执法 行政处罚 |
| 英文关键词: crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble public security law enforcement administrative penalty |
| 基金项目:安徽省教育研究重点项目(Jyxm2023003)；安徽公安学院重点科研项目(2025xjkyzd04) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十三条所界定的寻衅滋事罪,因其构成要件存在一定程度的开放性,故而在司法实践中面临法律适用与执法规范的双重考验。对寻衅滋事罪核心构成要件展开深入解析,以此清晰界定其主观层面所应具有的“无事生非”“借故生非”这类主观动机,并且细致讲解四种客观行为类型,同时明确“情节恶劣”的认定准则。针对公安执法中因法条用语模糊产生的“口袋化”风险以及“以罚代刑”这类不当处理情形,探究运用大数据模型开展精准监督,并且加强检察纠偏与源头治理等创新机制,以此推动该罪名的规范适用,实现惩罚犯罪与保障权利、治罪与治理的有机结合。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The crime of provoking trouble as defined in Article 293 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China faces dual challenges in judicial practice—legal application and law enforcement standards—due to the open-ended nature of its constitutive elements. This study conducts an in-depth analysis of the core constitutive elements of the crime, clarifying subjective motivations such as "provoking trouble without cause" and "raising false accusations." It also elaborates on four types of objective conduct and specifies the criteria for determining "serious circumstances." Based on this, it explores the use of big data models for precise supervision to address risks of "overbroad interpretation" and improper practices like "punishing by fines instead of criminal penalties" in public security enforcement. Additionally, it proposes innovative mechanisms such as prosecutorial correction and source governance to promote standardized application of the crime, achieving an organic integration of punishing crime, safeguarding rights, and balancing criminal punishment with governance. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|