|
| “浙江第一悬案”的追诉时效研究 |
| On the Limitation of Prosecution in the No. 1 Unsolved Case in Zhejiang |
| |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.202602007 |
| 中文关键词: 追诉时效 追诉时效终点 追诉时效中断 浙江第一悬案 |
| 英文关键词: limitation of prosecution end point of the limitation of prosecution interruption of limitation of prosecution the No. 1 unsolved case in Zhejiang |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 16 |
| 全文下载次数: 18 |
| 中文摘要: |
| “浙江第一悬案”即宁波、绍兴系列持枪抢劫杀人案，涉及七次抢劫罪、跨度14年，历时22年才破案，具有很强的综合性，涉及追诉时效起点终点的确定、追诉时效中断、追诉时效在跨法犯和共同犯罪中的适用等问题。追诉时效的功能是判断对某个人的某个罪追究刑事责任是否具有合法性，关于追诉时效终点，“二分法说”的解释力强于其他学说，犯罪人逃避侦查的行为有多种表现形式，将其限于积极逃避的观点则是不可取的。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The "No. 1 Unsolved Case in Zhejiang" refers to the Ningbo-Shaoxing series of armed robbery and murder cases, which involved seven counts of robbery, spanned 14 years, and took 22 years to solve. The case is highly complex and raises issues concerning the determination of the starting and ending points of the limitation period for prosecution, its interruption, and its application to offenses spanning different legal regimes and to joint crimes. The function of the limitation period for prosecution is to determine whether it is lawful to initiate prosecution for a specific crime committed by a specific individual. Regarding the end point of the limitation period for prosecution, the "binary approach" offers greater explanatory power than other doctrines. Criminals' acts of evading investigation may take various forms, and it is inadvisable to limit the interpretation to active evasion only. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |