| The cross-collective transfer of the right to use rural residential land holds practical necessity in activating the property value of homesteads, revitalizing idle homestead resources, and promoting rural revitalization. Currently, pilot legislations across regions have established an institutional framework for the cross-collective transfer of the right to use rural residential land, encompassing aspects such as conditions, procedures, durations, methods, usage regulations, revenue distribution, and safeguards for transferees′ rights. Nevertheless, there remain deficiencies in terms of the identity restrictions on transferors, the "one household, one homestead" entry criterion, the legal status of transferees in their new residences, and the institutional logic of revenue distribution. Future reforms should adhere to the principle of "prudent advancement" in the market-oriented allocation of homestead resources, optimize the rules for cross-collective transfer of the right to use rural residential land based on "improving resource allocation efficiency, " clarify the "special member" status of transferees and their rights protection mechanisms, and improve the revenue distribution mechanism to balance the interests of farmers, collectives, and governments. |