|
| 个人自治法益观下“不作为诈骗”的保证人地位分析 |
| Analysis of the Guarantor Status of "Non-Act Fraud" Under the Perspective of Personal Autonomy Legal Interests |
| 投稿时间：2023-11-20 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.202403008 |
| 中文关键词: 诈骗罪 法益 不作为犯 保证人地位 客观归责 |
| 英文关键词: fraud legal interest non-act crime guarantor status objective imputation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 15 |
| 全文下载次数: 14 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 从只考虑法益客观侧面的传统观点来分析不作为诈骗并不全面，需要转向个人自治的法益观，考虑诈骗罪法益的主观“自治”侧面。“自治”的范围要分别受到社会效率与安全、主体相互间自由价值辩证统一的约束。为满足不作为与作为等价性评价与区分民刑诈骗的要求，可以采取危险来源控制说的立场，将内容限于能对受骗人造成损失且难以救济作为基础事实判断。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The analysis of non-act fraud, grounded solely in the traditional framework that exclusively considers the objective dimension of legal interests, lacks comprehensiveness. A paradigm shift toward an individual-autonomy-oriented legal-interest perspective is imperative. This transition involves a nuanced examination of the subjective facet of "autonomy" within the context of fraudulent activities. The delineation of the scope of "autonomy" should be subject to meticulous constraints associated with social efficiency, security considerations, and the dialectical synthesis of freedom values interwoven among individuals. In order to fulfill the prerequisites for equivalency assessment and the demarcation between civil and criminal fraud, it is plausible to adopt the standpoint advocated by the theory of controlling the source of danger. This perspective confines the guarantor status in cases of non-genuine non-act fraud to judicious assessments founded on the potential harm inflicted upon the deceived party and the inherent challenges associated with providing redress. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |