文章摘要
论检察机关法律监督职能的宪法回归
On the Constitutional Return of the Legal Supervision Function of the Procuratorial Organs
投稿时间:2022-03-18  
DOI:10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.2022040005
中文关键词: 法律监督权  合宪性原则  监察体制改革  检察建议  抗诉
英文关键词: right of legal supervision  principle of constitutionality  reform of the supervisory system  procuratorial suggestion  protest
基金项目:
作者单位
侯跃伟 中国政法大学 刑事司法学院, 北京 100088 
李嘉 中国政法大学 刑事司法学院, 北京 100088 
摘要点击次数: 147
全文下载次数: 132
中文摘要:
      监察体制改革后,随着职务犯罪侦查权以及相关人员的转隶,检察机关的职能定位成为亟待厘清的问题。纵观我国检察制度的发展史不难发现,检察机关在法律监督职能的行使中出现了专项适用、倾斜适用和软化适用等三个不同阶段。究其缘由,或源于特殊时期的社会管控需求,或源于我国长期重刑轻民的思维惯性。而本次改革,恰恰为检察机关的主业回归提供了绝佳的契机。在合宪性原则的要求下,检察机关的权能定位应当围绕法律监督职能进行:一方面,检察机关应当继续加强已有的提出检察建议和提起抗诉两种法律监督方式;另一方面,也要拓展调查监督、公益诉讼、企业合规等新兴业务领域,回归宪法对检察机关职能的本源定位。
英文摘要:
      After the reform of the supervisory system, with the transfer of the power to investigate crimes in office and related personnel, the functional positioning of the procuratorial organs has become an urgent issue to be clarified. Throughout the history of China′s procuratorial system, it is easy to find that the procuratorial organs in the exercise of legal supervision functions in the three different stages of special application, inclined application and softened application. The reason for this, or from a special period of social control needs, or from China′s long-standing inertia of thinking that emphasizes criminality over the people. The reform provides an excellent opportunity for the procuratorial authorities to return to their main task. In accordance with the principle of constitutionality, the procuratorial authorities should focus on their legal supervision functions: on the one hand, they should continue to strengthen the two existing legal supervision methods of making recommendations and filing protests; on the other hand, they should also expand new business areas such as investigative supervision, public interest litigation, and corporate compliance, returning to the original constitutional positioning of their functions.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭