文章摘要
行为保全制度存在的相关问题及对策建议
Research on the Perfection of the Initiation and Review of the Behavior Preservation System
投稿时间:2021-10-12  
DOI:10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.2022020006
中文关键词: 行为保全  启动主体与条件  审查  执行
英文关键词: behavior preservation  initiating subject and conditions  review  execution
基金项目:
作者单位
白宝芬 四川大学 法学院, 四川 成都 610044 
郑玮洺 四川大学 法学院, 四川 成都 610044 
摘要点击次数: 130
全文下载次数: 116
中文摘要:
      我国行为保全制度自2012年纳入《民事诉讼法》以来,在司法实践中运用并不多,相关内容无法落实,难以有效保护申请人的权利。无论是行为保全启动的主体,还是审查程序,抑或行为保全的执行,现阶段都存在一些问题。行为保全启动主体的争论,启动条件的标准概括过于模糊,行为保全审查期限是否合理,如何有效执行等问题,令行为保全在我国的实践中受到阻碍,因此,在法律层面需要进一步完善,才能推动行为保全在我国的发展。
英文摘要:
      Since my country′s behavior preservation system was incorporated into the "Civil Procedure Law" in 2012, it has not been used much in judicial practice. The relevant content cannot be implemented and it is difficult to effectively protect the rights of applicants. Whether it is the subject of the act preservation, the review procedure, or the execution of the act preservation, there are various problems in our country at this stage. The controversy of the initiating subject of behavior preservation, the criteria for the initiation conditions are too general and vague, whether the review period of behavior preservation is reasonable, how to effectively implement the behavior preservation, etc. , have hindered the practice of behavior preservation in our country, and it needs further legal aspects. Perfection can promote the development of behavior preservation in our country.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭