|
| 美国反垄断民事诉讼中企图垄断行为的认定 |
| Identification of Attempted Monopolization in the U.S. Civil Antitrust Litigation: Example of Ningbo Shunyu′s Case |
| 投稿时间：2021-09-24 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.2022020005 |
| 中文关键词: 企图垄断 构成要件 管辖权 |
| 英文关键词: attempted monopolization constructive elements jurisdiction |
| 基金项目:浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(21NDQN274YB)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 145 |
| 全文下载次数: 123 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 企图垄断是美国反垄断法中一个特有的规则，在我国现行反垄断法中并没有与之相对应的条文。以舜宇光学科技(集团)有限公司在美遭遇的反垄断诉讼一案(以下简称“宁波舜宇案”)为视角，通过介绍美国联邦反垄断法中企图垄断规则的四大构成要件，分析宁波舜宇案败诉之原因，帮助我国企业正确认识企图垄断规则，降低对美贸易中的法律风险。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Attempted monopolization is a special rule in the U. S. antitrust law, in which no corresponding rule in China′s antitrust law. This paper takes the antitrust suit faced by the Sunny Optical Technology(Group)Co. , Ltd. as an example. By introducing the four elements of attempted monopolization of the U. S. federal antitrust law, and analyzing the reasons for losing the case, it can help China′s enterprises to correctly understand the rule of attempted monopolization and reduce the legal risks in the trade with the U. S. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |