|
| 《华盛顿协议》下工程教育专业建设路径选择 |
| Path Selection of Engineering Education Establishment from the Perspective of the Washington Accord |
| 投稿时间：2017-05-25 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.201703017 |
| 中文关键词: 《华盛顿协议》 “卓越计划” 工程教育 |
| 英文关键词: Washington Accord EEETP engineering education |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4599 |
| 全文下载次数: 3509 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 比较《华盛顿协议》成员工程教育论证制度和各自特点，并比较美国工程教育评估和我国工程教育认证与“卓越计划”，分析ABET工程教育认证标准和“卓越计划”，借鉴《华盛顿协议》工程教育专业认证理念内容和标准条款，提出以工程教育专业认证为抓手，改革工程教育人才培养目标、课程结构体系，强化师资队伍建设的工程教育专业建设路径。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This paper compares the engineering education systems and characteristics of the Washington Accord members, expounds the basic situation of engineering education evaluation in the United States, the engineering education accreditation and the EEETP(Excellent Engineers Education Training Plan)in China, and analyzes the standards of ABET and the tasks of the EEETP. Based on the basis of contents and standard terms of Washington Accord, the study concludes that the path selection of engineering education establishment should rely on the professional accreditation of engineering education, the reform of the training objectives and curriculum structure systems, and the strengthening of the construction of teacher team. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |