|
| 论法与法之间抵触的判断规则——在放权地方立法背景下的观察 |
| Discussion on Judging Criteria of Collision Between Law and Law ——In the Background of Granting Authorization to Local Legislation |
| 投稿时间：2015-07-22 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.201601006 |
| 中文关键词: 法与法抵触 判断标准 类型化分析 法律原则 法律规则 |
| 英文关键词: collision between law and law judging criteria type analysis legal principle legal rule |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3731 |
| 全文下载次数: 3133 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 现行法律并未明确规定法与法之间抵触的判断标准，理论和实务也大多倾向于对抵触情形进行列举式描述。为了使抵触的判断标准更具操作性，从规范角度进行精细化建构尤为必要。法与法之间的抵触微观上是法的要素之间的抵触，法的要素包括法律概念、法律规则、法律原则，通过逻辑的整合，可以将法与法的抵触分为下位法规则与上位法原则的抵触、下位法规则与上位法规则的抵触。下位法应当遵循上位法的基本原则，但法律原则不应包括主观的立法者本意。对于不同位阶法律规则之间的抵触，法律规则逻辑结构仅可以作为抵触的抽象分类标准，至于具体的判断规则，仍需依据法律规范的内容种类进行类型化分析。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The current law doesn't clearly define the standard how to judge collision between law and law, the theory and practice also tend to describe the conflict situation. In order to make the judgment more operational, it is necessary to elaborate from the angle of the standard. The contradiction between law and law is the contradiction between the elements of law, and the elements of law include the legal concept, legal rule and legal principle. Through the integration of logic, it can be divided into the conflict between subordinate rule and principle of upper law, and conflict between subordinate rule and upper rule. The subordinate law should follow the basic principle of the upper law, while the legal principle should not include the subjective intention of legislator. For collision between different legal of rules, the logical structure of legal rules can only be used standard of abstract classification, as to the specific judgment rule, it is still necessary to carry on the analysis of type and contents of the legal norms. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |