|
| 论环境公益诉讼中既判力主观范围的扩张 |
| The Subjective Scope of Res Judicata Expansion in Environmental Public Interest Litigation |
| 投稿时间：2015-02-21 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.201503007 |
| 中文关键词: 环境公益诉讼 判决既判力 主观范围扩张 |
| 英文关键词: environmental public interest litigation res judicata the expansion of res judicata |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3721 |
| 全文下载次数: 2962 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 近日，著名主持人柴静拍摄的《穹顶之下》引起了社会重大反响，十二届全国人大三次会议中环境保护问题继续成为热议焦点。而新《民事诉讼法》在修订中加入了公益诉讼条款，随着全社会对环保问题愈加重视，日后通过司法手段保护环境的案件必将不断增多。虽然目前我国的环境公益诉讼还处于起步阶段，但既判力问题是环境公益诉讼无法回避的问题，而传统既判力理论已经无法适应当前环境公益诉讼的司法实践。应该将环境公益诉讼与既判力主观范围扩张理论相结合，明确在何种情况之下对环境公益诉讼的判决既判力主观范围进行适当扩张，使其他的主体不再就该环境公益提起诉讼，这样的设置可以有效防止重复诉讼的发生，节约司法成本、提高司法权威。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Recently, “under the dome” filmed by renowned director Chai Jing aroused great repercussions. Problems of environmental protection continues to be a hot topic in the three session of the twelve National People's Congress. Along with our country new revised “Civil Procedural Law” to join the public welfare lawsuit clause, the future to protect environment cases will be more and more through judicial. Though it is undeniable that China's current environmental public interest litigation is still in the initial stage, res judicata is an inevitable problem when discussing environmental public interest litigation. And the traditional theory about res judicata has been unable to meet the current environmental public interest litigation. Through the environmental public interest litigation and the subjective scope of res judicata expansion theory, will make it clear that what circumstances can the environmental public interest litigation judgment effectiveness of expansion, to prevent the same lawsuit. This setting can effectively prevent the occurrence of bad action, saving the judicial cost, enhance the judicial authority. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |