|
| 行政公益诉讼管辖模式选择 |
| Jurisdiction Mode of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Cases |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1008-5092.2008.03.005 |
| 中文关键词: 行政公益诉讼 异地管辖 提级管辖 |
| 英文关键词: administrative public interest litigation different district jurisdiction high-level jurisdiction |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4145 |
| 全文下载次数: 3430 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在建立行政公益诉讼已经达成共识的情形下,管辖问题的改革不仅要考虑保护相对人私人利益,同时也要注意保障公共利益.对三种管辖模式利弊分析后,"对于涉及私人利益的行政案件施行异地管辖,涉及公共利益的行政案件施行提级管辖"的思路,更能通过程序公正来保障实体公正,从制度层面切断或阻隔行政等外部力量对司法的不当干预,实现行政权和司法权的良性互动. |
| 英文摘要: |
| Several rules about jurisdiction of administrative cases which are implemented since February 2008,clearly passed three modes,high-level jurisdiction,different district trial and designated jurisdiction.Nowadays the establishment of the public interest litigation has reached consensus,so the reform of jurisdiction should consider safeguarding both of private and public interest.After comprehensively analyzing the modes,methods that different case apply different jurisdiction mode are better to protect entities fair by due process.This system effectively blocks external power to interfere with justice,so that achieve the executive and the judicial power benign interaction. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|