|
| 试论夫妻共同债务的认定——以2018年新司法解释为切入点 |
| On the Determination of Husband and Wife's Common Debt ——Starting with the New Judicial Interpretation of 2018 |
| 投稿时间：2018-11-12 |
| DOI：10.16018/j.cnki.cn32-1499/c.201901006 |
| 中文关键词: 夫妻共同债务 认定规则 日常家事代理 举证责任分配 |
| 英文关键词: husband and wife common debt cognizance rule daily family affairs agent burden of proof distribution |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3537 |
| 全文下载次数: 2841 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 夫妻共同债务的认定一直是学界及司法实践中争议的热点话题。2018年1月18日最高法出台的新司法解释开创性的引入了夫妻日常家事代理制度，此规定所确立的认定标准较为合理地疏通了夫妻共同债务认定的举证责任分配，但我国目前法律上欠缺对于家事代理权等的具体规定，这不利于司法实践的灵活操作。对于新认定规则的具体实施而言，还需把握债权人和夫妻中非举债方之间的权益平衡点。鉴此，以李某诉宁某、毛某民间借贷纠纷案为例，利用当前的法律法规、法学理论对本案进行分析，并探讨当下夫妻共同债务认定规则中存在的不足，希望以此为契机，提出完善夫妻共同债务认定的立法建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The recognition of joint debt between husband and wife has always been a hot topic in academic circles and judicial practice. The new judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme Law on January 18, 2018 introduced the agency system of daily household affairs of husband and wife. This stipulation establishes the confirmation standard to dredge reasonably the burden of proof distribution of the joint debt between husband and wife. However, the current law of our country lacks the specific provisions on family agency, which is not conducive to the flexible operation of judicial practice. For the implementation of the new rules, it is also necessary to grasp the balance of rights and interests between creditors and non-borrowers. Based on the above reasons, take Li and Mao's private lending dispute as an example, using the current laws and regulations, legal theory to analyze the case. Furthermore, in view of the fact that the current provisions of the Civil Code are being codified, it is hoped that Taking this as an opportunity, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions to perfect the joint debt between husband and wife. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |