|
| 哈特的诠释学方法及其限度——阅读《大师学述：哈特》 |
| Hart＇ s Interpretation Methodology and its Limits --On Book Review：H. LA Hart |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1008-5092.2011.04.011 |
| 中文关键词: 诠释学方法 义务 承认规则 |
| 英文关键词: interpretation methodology obligation the rule of recognition |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3565 |
| 全文下载次数: 3082 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 哈特在方法上完成了法哲学发展的诠释学转向。哈特所主张的诠释性方法一方面把实践的内在面相引入法律理论的分析中，另一方面内在面向中的批判反思态度并不必然包括道德理由。在《大师学述：哈特》中，麦考密克围绕着诠释方法通过发展批判反思态度这一概念对哈特的理论进行了辩护。但这个辩护和分析却有其缺陷和不足，因此尚有进一步向前推进的必要。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Hart methodologically accomplishes the turn of interpretation in legal philosophy.He holds on the one hand to introduce the internal facet of practice into the analysis of legal theory,and not definitely include moral reason into its reflective attitude on the other.In Hart,McCormick defends Hart through the concept of reflective attitude in interpretation methodology,and with some flaws and shortcomings it needs a further advancement however. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |